Cape Ann CurrentKeeping Cape Ann current.Free public information for Gloucester, Rockport, Essex and Manchester-by-the-Sea, in plain English
Election 2026 · Question 4 explainer
Question 4 is about voter registration. It would let eligible people register, or update an address, at the polls on Election Day, starting in twenty twenty eight. A Yes vote makes that change. A No vote keeps the current deadline, ten days before an election. Supporters say it would help renters, students and people who move often. Opponents say elections must be protected from fraud, and that the advance deadline serves that purpose. As of October twenty sixth, the Yes committees have reported about one hundred seventy one thousand dollars, and no committee against is listed. Read the full explainer, with every source and the data, at capeanncurrent.com slash elections. The Cape Ann Current takes no position.
Today a person must register to vote at least 10 days before an election. Question 4 asks whether eligible people could also register, or update their address, at their polling place on Election Day. Voters decide on November 3.
Figures in this article were checked against the cited sources on Oct. 26, 2026. Sources are numbered at the end.
This explainer takes no position on Question 4. It lays out the law, the arguments, and the public numbers.
What voters are deciding, in the state's own words.
Sources 1, 2, 3, 13.
A law proposed by voters, not a change to the state constitution.
Question 4 is a law proposed by initiative petition. An initiative petition is a way for voters to put a proposed law on the ballot. The official title is “Election Day Registration.” The petition is Initiative Petition 25-08, also filed as House No. 5001. It is a state statute, which is an ordinary law. After voters approve a law like this, Article 48 lets the Legislature amend or repeal it, subject to the governor's veto and a possible referendum petition.
| Question 4 at a glance | |
|---|---|
| Who filed it | Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin signed it. Every petition needs 10 first signers. Galvin told the Boston Globe it was the first petition he had personally signed. |
| What it changes | Adds a new section to state election law (Chapter 51, Section 34A). It lets an eligible person register, or update an address, at the polling place on the day of an election. It does not remove the 10 day deadline for any other day. |
| Start date | January 1, 2028. |
| What it takes to pass | Under Article 48 of the state constitution (the rules for citizen petitions), a proposed law passes if a majority of those voting on it say Yes, and the Yes votes equal at least 30 percent of all ballots cast at the election. |
| The Legislature | The Legislature held a hearing March 31, 2026. On May 4, a majority of its Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions recommended “no action.” Before the vote, Article 48 lets the Legislature pass the petition as written, which makes it law without a ballot vote, or leave it alone. The Legislature does not rewrite the petition itself. If it does not pass the petition by the first Wednesday of May, a majority of the first ten signers may make a small "perfecting" change, if the Attorney General certifies that it does not materially change the substance. The Legislature may also put a substitute measure on the ballot beside the petition. It did not vote on this petition before May 6, 2026. |
| Changes later | Article 48 says that, subject to the governor's veto and the right of referendum, the General Court “may amend or repeal a law approved by the people.” That means the Legislature could change this law after a Yes vote. Whether it would is not known. |
| Courts | We found no lawsuit and no Supreme Judicial Court ruling about Question 4. The Legislature's committee report says the Attorney General certified the petition under Article 48. It adds that this step does not test constitutionality, and no court has reviewed the petition. |
In plain words: Question 4 is an ordinary law. It would start in 2028 and would add Election Day registration without removing the 10 day deadline for other days. Lawmakers could change it later. No court case about it was found.
Sources 1, 2, 12, 20, 30.
From the full text of the proposed law in the 2026 Information for Voters booklet.
A registered voter could not change party enrollment at a primary this way. The new section would not apply to registering for annual or special town meetings. The Attorney General or the district attorney must investigate credible claims of illegal registration or voting twice. The Secretary of the Commonwealth must write rules and, “to the extent possible,” give election officers at each polling place access to the statewide list of registered voters. Registrars must publish polling places at least seven days before an election. The law also repeals Section 1F of Chapter 51. That older rule let some unlisted residents vote for president and vice president only, if they applied by the tenth day before the election.
Provisional ballot: a ballot cast when a voter's eligibility needs to be checked. It is counted only if officials confirm the voter is eligible. Unenrolled: registered to vote but not enrolled in a political party. Registrars: the local officials who keep the list of registered voters. Oath: a written promise made under penalty of law.
Sources 1, 31.
Years of bills in the Legislature, then a petition to the voters.
The Senate approves a bill for Election Day registration. It does not gain support in the House.
The Legislature approves early voting. The Senate tries to add same day registration, and the House opposes the idea.
Galvin proposes a bill for same day registration. It does not advance.
The Senate puts same day registration in a large elections bill. About three months later the House drops it from its version.
Gov. Charlie Baker signs a law that makes mail voting permanent and keeps expanded early voting. It also shortens the registration cutoff from 20 days before an election to 10.
Galvin files the Election Day registration petition, according to CommonWealth Beacon.
House Majority Leader Michael Moran tells the Boston Globe that voters already have “ample opportunities to engage in the democratic process.” He was speaking about same day registration proposals in general.
Galvin's office certifies the first round of signatures for 11 petitions, including this one. A petition needed 74,574 certified signatures. CommonWealth Beacon reported Question 4 had more than 87,000.
The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions holds a hearing. Galvin urges lawmakers to act. Clerks and advocates give different views on readiness.
A majority of the committee recommends that the Legislature take no action. The Legislature does not vote before May 6. Backers then needed 12,429 more signatures to reach the ballot.
The question qualifies after the second round of signatures. We did not find the exact date.
Attorney General Andrea Campbell says on GBH radio that she supports Election Day registration.
A coalition of voting rights groups forms a “Vote YES on 4” committee. A UMass Amherst and WCVB poll (Aug. 5 to 12) finds 69 percent of 800 registered voters would definitely or probably vote Yes and 22 percent No.
A Massachusetts Republican Party spokesperson does not say whether the party will organize a campaign against the question.
State primary, held under the current rules.
The Boston Globe editorial board endorses a Yes vote.
Early voting. The registration deadline falls inside it, on Saturday, Oct. 24.
GBH reports that no committee has formed to oppose the question.
Election Day. Voters decide Question 4.
Start date of the law if voters approve it.
Sources 3, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 28.
Concrete effects, who says so, and what is not known.
Sources 1, 3, 12, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27. The Moran quote comes from a statement to the Boston Globe in Sept. 2025 about same day registration proposals in general.
From the Secretary of the Commonwealth's 2026 Information for Voters booklet. The state does not certify these claims, and neither does the Current.
Written by Norma B. Shulman, YES on Election Day Registration.
Written by Amy Carnevale, Massachusetts Republican Party.
The majority of the Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions did not take a side for or against the idea. It wrote that it “supports ongoing efforts to expand voter access and participation” but that the petition as written “does not adequately address the operational challenges raised by the testimony it received,” including staffing and technology needs. Eight legislators signed the majority report: Senators Cindy Friedman, Brendan Crighton and Barry Finegold, and Representatives Alice Hanlon Peisch, Kate Hogan, Frank Moran, Michael Day and David Vieira.
| Campaign for Yes | Campaign for No | |
|---|---|---|
| Organized group | “YES on Election Day Voter Registration,” a ballot question committee. Shulman, a Democratic activist from Framingham, helps run it. A coalition of MassVOTE, the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, Common Cause Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Voter Table and the ACLU of Massachusetts formed a “Vote YES on 4” group in August. | No ballot question committee had formed as of Oct. 20, 2026, according to GBH. The Massachusetts Republican Party wrote the official argument against. A party spokesperson did not say in August whether it would organize a campaign. |
| Money (OCPF, as of Oct. 26, 2026) | YES on Election Day Voter Registration: $168,052 raised in 2025 and 2026 combined, $156,111 spent, $11,941 cash on hand. Vote YES on 4 Election Day Registration: $3,025 raised, plus $152,981 in kind (goods and services given instead of cash). | No committee registered with OCPF. Nothing to report. |
| Galvin committee gifts (OCPF) | OCPF's itemized records list four transfers from the William F. Galvin Committee to YES on Election Day Voter Registration: $25,000 on Oct. 14, 2025, $25,000 on Nov. 10, 2025, $16,000 on May 19, 2026 and $13,000 on May 26, 2026. That adds up to $79,000. | Not applicable. |
In plain words: As of October 26, OCPF shows about 168 thousand dollars raised by the main Yes committee, plus about 153 thousand dollars in kind to a second Yes committee. The No side has no committee registered with OCPF, and the Republican Party wrote the official argument against.
Sources 1, 13, 19, 22, 46. Dollar figures are from OCPF's public records as of Oct. 26, 2026. In 2025 and 2026 the Yes committee reported $80,423 and $87,630 in receipts. News reports differ on the Galvin gift: the Boston Globe (Sept. 5, 2026) said $29,000 and GBH (Oct. 20, 2026) said $79,000. OCPF's itemized records match the GBH figure, so we use $79,000. The Globe figure may have been counted on an earlier date; we could not confirm why it differs.
The lists are not the same length because of what public sources name. Length is not a judgment about either side.
| Supporters named in public sources | Opponents named in public sources |
|---|---|
| Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin (filed the petition) | Massachusetts Republican Party and its chair, Amy Carnevale |
| Gov. Maura Healey, Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll and U.S. Rep. Ayanna Pressley | Mike Walsh, Republican candidate for Attorney General |
| Attorney General Andrea Campbell | Chester Tam, Republican candidate for the state House |
| Massachusetts Democratic Party (state committee) and Progressive Mass | Chris Ryan, Republican State Committee member, who said he is personally against it |
| MassVOTE, League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, Common Cause Massachusetts, Massachusetts Voter Table, ACLU of Massachusetts | The Saugus town clerk and assistant town clerk, in a letter to the editor |
| The Boston Globe editorial board |
In plain words: On the Yes side, public sources name statewide officials, the state Democratic Party and several voting rights groups. On the No side, they name the state Republican Party, two Republican candidates, one Republican State Committee member and the Saugus town clerks.
Sources 12, 14, 15, 19, 21, 23, 26.
The calendar, provisional ballots, turnout, polls, and how Massachusetts compares.
Key point: In 2026 early voting began on October 17, and the registration deadline was October 24. After October 24, no one could register for the November 3 election. Question 4 would change that only for Election Day, starting in 2028.
Source: Secretary of the Commonwealth, 2026 voting options (source 3). The Election Assistance Commission's 2024 survey notes that Massachusetts has a week during early voting when a person can register and vote in the same trip before the deadline closes (source 33).
Key point: In November 2024, 5,106 provisional ballots were cast in Massachusetts and 3,309 were not counted, about 65 percent. Common Cause counts 27 of those as rejected for lack of acceptable ID and says the rest were mostly administrative problems.
Source: Common Cause Massachusetts, “Analysis: Provisional Ballots Cast in November 2024 Election,” March 26, 2025 (source 27). The group's press release says 66 percent, and its report says 65 percent. We calculate 64.8 percent. The counted number, 1,797, is our subtraction. Common Cause supports Question 4. For comparison, the Election Assistance Commission reports that across states that gave data, 73.8 percent of 1,736,209 provisional ballots in 2024 were counted and 25.1 percent were rejected (source 33). States use provisional ballots in different ways, so the two figures are not a like for like match. Boston figures in the group's report are not shown because its two Boston numbers do not agree.
| Registered | Votes cast | |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4,884,076 | 2,511,461 |
| 2024 | 5,142,343 | 3,512,930 |
Key point: Statewide turnout was 51.42 percent in 2022 and 68.31 percent in 2024, as published by the Secretary of the Commonwealth.
Source: Secretary of the Commonwealth, Voter Turnout Statistics (source 9). Bars start at zero.
Key point: Three UMass Amherst and WCVB polls found majority support: 64 percent in October 2024, 69 percent in August 2026 and 67 percent in October 2026. The 2024 question was worded differently. The Suffolk University and Boston Globe poll of Oct. 14 to 18, 2026 (500 registered voters) did not report a number for Question 4 in the coverage we read.
Sources: UMass Amherst (source 29); UMass Amherst/WCVB toplines for August 2026 and the October 2026 report (source 47); Boston Globe, Aug. 21, 2026 (source 19). In October the university interviewed 852 registered voters and matched them to a sample of 800. In the 2024 poll, support among Republicans was 43 percent. The 6 percent gap is not explained in the release.
Share of voting age citizens who said they voted in November 2024, with the survey's margin of error.
| State | What the state allows, per NCSL and the EAC |
|---|---|
| Minnesota | Election Day registration (listed since 1974) |
| Wisconsin | Election Day registration (1975) |
| New Hampshire | Election Day registration (1994) |
| Vermont | Up to and including Election Day (2015) |
| Rhode Island | Election Day, for president and vice president only |
| Massachusetts | None on Election Day. An overlap of early voting and the deadline lets some people register and vote in one trip. |
| Maine | Election Day registration (1973) |
| Connecticut | Election Day, not for primaries (2012) |
Key point: In the Census survey, 68.9 percent of Massachusetts citizens said they voted in 2024, with a margin of error of 3.1 points. That range, 65.8 to 72.0, overlaps the ranges for Rhode Island, Maine, Connecticut, New Hampshire and Vermont. Minnesota's range, 73.0 to 78.8, does not overlap it. Many other things affect turnout, so the table does not show what any one law does.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, November 2024 Voting and Registration Supplement, Table 4b (source 34); NCSL (source 32); EAC (source 33). The survey is self reported. The margin gives the 90 percent confidence range, in percentage points. Bars start at zero. Massachusetts is shaded differently only to help you find it.
Past Massachusetts votes on this topic. We did not find an earlier statewide ballot question on Election Day registration in the sources we reviewed, which include the state's election results database (PD43+) and news coverage. Earlier efforts were bills in the Legislature, listed in the timeline.
Counts differ by source. The facts below come from state agencies, federal agencies and named studies.
| Who counted | What they counted |
|---|---|
| NCSL | Lists 24 states plus the District of Columbia with some form of same day registration, and also lists Massachusetts for its early voting overlap. Types vary: Election Day, early voting only, or limited cases. |
| EAC, 2024 survey | 29 states reported some form. Twenty three allowed it on Election Day. Twenty three allowed it during in-person early voting. Ten reported an overlap between early voting and the registration deadline. Five reported specific cases. |
| News reports in 2026 | Counts from 22 to 24 states plus D.C., depending on the source and the date. |
Key point: About two dozen states plus Washington, D.C. allow some form of same day registration. The exact count depends on how you define it.
Sources 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 32, 33. Sources also differ on New England. WBUR and GBH say Massachusetts is the only New England state without Election Day registration, because Rhode Island allows it for president and vice president only. Boston.com says Massachusetts and Rhode Island are the two without it. The EAC and NCSL describe Rhode Island's rule as presidential only.
U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2016
GAO reviewed 33 studies of same day registration. It found that 21 of them showed higher turnout. GAO wrote that the “majority of studies on same day registration and all vote-by-mail found that these policies increased turnout.” The text we read gave no percentage point figure.
University of Wisconsin researchers, 2009
In a report for the Pew Charitable Trusts, Burden, Canon, Mayer and Moynihan wrote that careful studies put the effect of Election Day registration at “three to seven percentage points.” Their own 2008 county data found about six to seven points for Election Day registration alone.
MIT Election Data and Science Lab
The lab says scholars have “generally reported three to six percent average gains in turnout.” It also notes that a study that looks at changes within states, by Keele and Minozzi (2013), finds the effect “appears much smaller.”
Key point: Most studies find Election Day registration raises turnout, with estimates of about 3 to 7 points. At least one study finds a much smaller effect. The size in Massachusetts is unknown.
Sources 35, 36, 37.
Key point: In 2024, same day registrations made up more than half of all registration transactions in Wyoming and Wisconsin, and 20 percent in Maine. Nationwide, states reported 2,627,300 same day registrations, 4.8 percent of registration transactions in states that reported.
Source: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 2024 Election Administration and Voting Survey (source 33). Share of registration transactions during the two years before the 2024 general election. Massachusetts, Missouri and New York did not report. Bars start at zero.
| State | 2024 count | Source detail |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | 296,287 voters registered when they voted, out of 3,272,414 voters (9.1 percent, our division) | Minnesota Secretary of State. Includes people who updated a name or address. |
| New Hampshire | At least 92,837 registered on Election Day (preliminary, Nov. 13) | State figures reported by the Boston Globe. Of these, 53 percent registered as undeclared, 27 percent as Republicans and 20 percent as Democrats. The record since 2000 is 99,299 in 2012. |
Key point: In Minnesota in 2024, about 9 percent of voters registered when they voted. In New Hampshire at least 92,837 people registered on Election Day.
Sources 38, 40.
New Hampshire, 2024
Secretary of State David Scanlan warned before the election that many same day registrations could cause lines. After it, the Globe reported some voters waited up to two hours. The Globe tied part of the surge to a 2021 removal of nearly 250,000 names from the voter list. A new law requiring proof of citizenship and photo ID took effect after the 2024 election and faces legal challenges.
Wisconsin clerks, 2009 survey
Researchers surveyed Wisconsin municipal clerks. Nearly 55 percent agreed that Election Day registration increases their administrative burden. Nearly 60 percent agreed that its benefits outweigh its costs, and 20 percent disagreed. Only 26 percent agreed it makes protecting the voting process harder, and 60 percent disagreed.
Maine, 2011
In 2011 the Legislature passed a law that ended same day registration for new voters. Its sponsor said the aim was to reduce clerks' workload. A people's veto referendum (a vote by the people to cancel a law passed by the Legislature) that November rejected that part of the law, 237,024 to 155,156, about 60 percent, according to Wikipedia's summary of the Maine tabulation. Maine has allowed Election Day registration since 1973.
Montana, 2014 to 2026
In 2014 Montana voters rejected, 57 percent, an initiative to end Election Day registration. A 2021 law ending it was struck down by the Montana Supreme Court in 2024. In May 2026 a judge blocked a 2025 law that would have kept people who register after noon on Election Day from voting in federal races. The state's Attorney General's office says unrestricted registration puts an “undue burden” on election administrators. The judge disagreed that the law would make administering elections easier.
Key point: Documented problems include long lines in New Hampshire in 2024 and clerk concerns about workload. Surveyed clerks in Wisconsin were split on burden but most said the benefits outweighed the costs.
Sources 36, 40, 41, 43, 44. EAC also reports that in 2024 same day registration accounted for 26.2 percent of provisional ballots cast nationwide, because ten states issue provisional ballots to same day registrants (source 33).
The Massachusetts fiscal statement found “no discernible material fiscal consequences.” The MIT lab, summarizing a 2012 Demos report, says costs in states that adopted it were often relatively low, and that officials “could not always identify the specific, additional costs.” At the March 31 hearing, clerks and advocates gave different views on readiness. According to Hoodline, some clerks said they expect higher costs, extra staff and possible long lines. Greenfield's city clerk said Election Day could be “a little bit busier,” and that what she would change depends on the Secretary of the Commonwealth's guidelines. We found no cost estimate for any one town.
Sources 1, 23, 25, 37.
Minnesota
Registrants must show they live where they say. A voucher, a registered voter from the same precinct who signs under penalty of perjury, can prove residence, but the voter must still give a license or ID number, or the last four digits of a Social Security number. Minnesota says each Election Day registrant is verified in the state database after the election, and discrepancies are referred to local law enforcement.
Maine
Waterville's city clerk said people must give proof of identity and of residency. Bangor's city clerk said a voter without proof is allowed to vote but must come back, within a week or two, to prove identity and eligibility, or the ballot is challenged.
Key point: Other states use proof of residence, written oaths or vouching, and follow up checks after the election. Both sides talk about security. We did not find a state published count of fraud cases tied to Election Day registration. We also did not find a published count of cases caught only after the vote.
Sources 39, 42.
Both sides use the language of access and of security.
The official argument for says the law “guarantees every eligible voice is heard.” The legislative committee says it “supports ongoing efforts to expand voter access.” The official argument against focuses on verification and election security.
The argument for promises “rigorous security safeguards.” The argument against calls for “meaningful verification before voting.” Both sides write about verification, and they differ on when it should happen.
Galvin said his office would need to give more trained people to busy places. Clerks, Rep. Peisch and the Saugus clerk raise staffing, technology and training. The Globe editorial board said clerks and Galvin's office would need to plan ahead.
Greenfield's city clerk said she would look to the Secretary of the Commonwealth's guidelines. The law gives that office the job of writing rules.
In the October 2024 UMass Amherst poll, 64 percent of residents overall supported Election Day registration, and 43 percent of Republicans did. Support was lower among Republicans but not absent.
CommonWealth Beacon notes that early voting, mail voting and automatic registration are in place. Mike Walsh cites them as a reason Question 4 is unnecessary. Supporters point to people who move close to a deadline.
Registered voters, party enrollment and turnout in Gloucester, Rockport, Essex and Manchester-by-the-Sea.
Gloucester is a city. Rockport, Essex and Manchester-by-the-Sea are towns. Question 4 would apply to city and town elections as well as state elections, but not to registering for town meetings. If it passes, each place would take Election Day registrations at its own polling places starting in 2028. The tables below use state data for 2022 and 2024.
| Place | Registered | Democrat | Republican | Unenrolled | Unenrolled share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gloucester | 24,153 | 5,471 | 1,973 | 16,439 | 68.1% |
| Rockport | 6,371 | 1,619 | 458 | 4,248 | 66.7% |
| Essex | 3,035 | 579 | 361 | 2,069 | 68.2% |
| Manchester-by-the-Sea | 4,467 | 1,002 | 536 | 2,900 | 64.9% |
| Four towns combined | 38,026 | 8,671 | 3,328 | 25,656 | 67.5% |
| Massachusetts | 5,142,343 | 1,352,937 | 434,887 | 3,302,493 | 64.2% |
Key point: On October 26, 2024, the four Cape Ann communities had 38,026 registered voters. About two out of three, 67.5 percent, were unenrolled, which means not enrolled in a party. The state share was 64.2 percent.
Source: Secretary of the Commonwealth, Enrollment Breakdown as of 10/26/2024 (source 4). Libertarian and other party or designation counts are not shown, so the columns do not add to the total. The shares are our division. Bars start at zero.
| Place | 2022 votes for governor | Registered, Aug. 27, 2022 | 2022 turnout, about | 2024 votes for president | Registered, Oct. 26, 2024 | 2024 turnout, about |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gloucester | 13,398 | 22,507 | 59.5% | 17,898 | 24,153 | 74.1% |
| Rockport | 4,295 | 6,128 | 70.1% | 5,232 | 6,371 | 82.1% |
| Essex | 1,844 | 2,895 | 63.7% | 2,438 | 3,035 | 80.3% |
| Manchester-by-the-Sea | 2,907 | 4,344 | 66.9% | 3,682 | 4,467 | 82.4% |
| Four towns combined | 22,444 | 35,874 | 62.6% | 29,250 | 38,026 | 76.9% |
| Massachusetts (official) | 2,511,461 | 4,884,076 (Oct.) | 51.42% | 3,512,930 | 5,142,343 | 68.31% |
Key point: In 2022, about 62.6 percent of registered voters in the four towns cast a ballot for governor, and in 2024 about 76.9 percent did for president. Both are higher than the state's official 51.42 and 68.31 percent. These are our estimates, made with a different method, so compare with care. Gloucester was lowest of the four in both years.
Sources: Secretary of the Commonwealth, PD43+ results for President 2024 and Governor 2022, “Total Votes Cast,” which includes blank ballots (sources 10, 11); enrollment reports (sources 4, 6); statewide turnout (source 9). These are our estimates: votes for the top office divided by registered voters. The town 2022 figures use registration from August 27, 2022. Statewide registration grew from 4,838,359 in August to 4,884,076 in October 2022 (source 8), so the town 2022 percentages run slightly high. Using the same method on the state gives 51.9 percent against the official 51.42. The town 2024 figures use the day of the registration deadline. Bars start at zero.
| Place | Aug. 27, 2022 | Feb. 24, 2024 | Oct. 26, 2024 | Feb. 1, 2025 | Change, Feb. to Oct. 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gloucester | 22,507 | 23,496 | 24,153 | 23,071 | +657 (2.8%) |
| Rockport | 6,128 | 6,327 | 6,371 | 6,247 | +44 (0.7%) |
| Essex | 2,895 | 2,990 | 3,035 | 2,972 | +45 (1.5%) |
| Manchester-by-the-Sea | 4,344 | 4,333 | 4,467 | 4,353 | +134 (3.1%) |
| Massachusetts | 4,838,359 | 4,957,403 | 5,142,343 | 5,025,826 | +184,940 (3.7%) |
Key point: Between February and October 2024, registered voters rose by 657 in Gloucester, 44 in Rockport, 45 in Essex and 134 in Manchester-by-the-Sea. Counts then fell by February 2025. The state snapshots do not explain why.
Sources: Secretary of the Commonwealth enrollment reports (sources 4, 5, 6, 7). Percent changes are our division. These are net changes over several months, not counts of people who registered in the last days before a deadline.
Registrations near the deadline
The Secretary of the Commonwealth publishes registered voter counts by city and town at set dates, such as late August and late October. We did not find town counts of how many people registered in the last 10 days before a deadline, or counts of people who tried to register after it.
Provisional ballots
Common Cause Massachusetts says 140 towns issued no provisional ballots in November 2024. The text of its report that we read does not list the four Cape Ann communities, and its appendix was not available to us. We did not find town counts elsewhere.
Local officials
We did not find public statements from the four local election offices about Question 4. Their views and any plans for staffing would be useful to readers, and we will add them if offered.
Candidates and past votes
We could not verify any Fifth Essex District candidate's stated position on Question 4 from public sources, so none is listed. We found no earlier statewide vote on this topic, so there are no past town results to compare.
The deadline to register for the November 3 election passed on October 24. Your local election office can answer questions about your own registration. To report an error in this article, write to [email protected] or [email protected].