ListenPodcastGet the Morning CurrentShare information
Cape Ann Current: Keeping Cape Ann current

Free public information for Gloucester, Rockport, Essex and Manchester-by-the-Sea, in plain English

Town news

State rep race: Where Delisio, Frieden and Tarr stand on the audit, the gun law and ICE

In League of Women Voters interviews released this week, the three candidates split on Question 9 and Election Day registration, agreed the legislative audit should happen, and said little about jobs, the state budget or health care.

Chart titled Fifth Essex, where they stand, comparing Christina Delisio, Gil Frieden and Dru Tarr on the legislative audit, Question 9 and Question 4
Positions as each candidate stated them in the League of Women Voters of Cape Ann interviews released Oct. 15, 2026. Illustration: Illustration: Cape Ann Current

Trust Check: Checked against public records

The three candidates for state representative in the Fifth Essex District sat down for 15 minute interviews with the League of Women Voters of Cape Ann, and the video went online Wednesday, Oct. 15, two days before early voting began. The questions were suggested by League members and were not given to the candidates in advance, the League said.

The district covers Gloucester, Rockport, Essex and Manchester-by-the-Sea. On the Nov. 3 ballot, as the state lists them:

  • Christina Delisio of Manchester-by-the-Sea, Republican
  • Gil Frieden of Essex, Transparency Inclusion Environment
  • Andrew "Dru" Tarr of Gloucester, Democrat, who won the seat in the March 31 special election

You can watch the full interviews (38 minutes) on 1623 Studios' YouTube channel or on the League's website, lwvcapeann.org. Here is what each candidate said, in their own words, and what did not come up.

At a glance

Positions as each candidate stated them in the interviews, listed alphabetically. Their full answers follow.

Audit of the Legislature
DelisioSupports; filed a brief backing the auditor
FriedenSupports; the auditor should get what she needs
TarrSupports a financial audit; opposes auditing how laws are made
Question 9: keep the 2024 gun law (Yes keeps it)
DelisioNo
FriedenYes
TarrUndecided
Question 4: register to vote on Election Day
DelisioNo
FriedenYes
TarrYes
ICE detentions
DelisioSupports ICE's role against dangerous criminals
FriedenWould “love to abolish ICE”
Tarr“Really troubling”; points to the PROTECT Act
How they would reach constituents
DelisioNewsletter, social media, office hours
FriedenAny way people want; weekly at the senior center
TarrNot asked this question

The audit of the Legislature

The law, explained

In November 2024, voters approved Question 1, which says the state auditor may audit the Legislature. It passed with 71.6% of the vote, which the candidates rounded to 72%. Lawmakers have argued that auditing how the Legislature makes laws would break the state constitution's separation of powers, and the audit has not started.

On June 3, 2026, the House voted 125 to 28 for H.5469, which limits the audit to four areas of the Legislature's administrative work and bars courts from deciding constitutional disputes between the auditor and lawmakers, NBC Boston reported. The Senate passed a different version 34 to 6 on July 30. Since July 31 the bill has been with a conference committee of House and Senate members, and it is not law, according to the Legislature's bill page.

Question 1 on this year's ballot is a separate measure. It would put the Legislature and the governor's office under the state public records law.

Sources: 2024 Question 1 results; H.5469 bill history; NBC Boston; 2026 Question 1 in our voter guide.

Christina Delisio said the Legislature should have listened to voters.

"72% said, 'Hey, we want to open up the books and see what you're doing.' And it's not about trying to find money. ... It's just about transparency and responsiveness of who we elect."

She said the bill now in committee "precludes the auditor from going and using judicial review," and she pointed to this year's Question 1, which would put the Legislature under the public records law, as "the next best thing." She said, "Massachusetts is the only legislature in the country that is not subject to the public records" law.

Fact check: Partly accurate. Nine states exempt their legislatures from public records laws in some form, according to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, as reported by The Boston Globe. Massachusetts is the only state where the governor, the Legislature and the courts all claim to be completely exempt. Sources: The Boston Globe, March 17, 2025, citing the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
Fact check: On judicial review: the House version of H.5469 would bar courts from deciding constitutional disputes between the auditor and lawmakers. It has not become law; the House and Senate versions are in a conference committee. The House vote was 125 to 28 on June 3, after Tarr took office in April. Sources: Massachusetts Legislature, H.5469 bill history; NBC Boston, June 3, 2026.

An attorney, she said she wrote an amicus brief supporting the auditor "unlike my opponent, one of my opponents," and she said "the person that's actually in office right now" voted "against the people."

Gil Frieden said the audit should go forward as voters approved it.

"My position is that 72% of us voted yes and it should happen. ... Auditor DiZoglio should be able to get the information she needs and do the audit she wants."

He said he fears this year's Question 1 "might have the same fate," passing at the ballot box and then being stalled by the Legislature. "That's what's so scary about politics," he said, "the people are passing ... ballot measures that are supposed to become laws and the legislature is invalidating them."

Dru Tarr said the 2024 vote "means that an audit needs to take place" and that the dispute is over its scope.

"I firmly believe that a financial audit conducted by the auditor would be completely constitutional. It's completely reasonable."

He said the Legislature already has an outside firm audit it every year.

Fact check: Accurate. The Legislature posts annual outside financial audits. The audit of its joint accounts for the year ended June 30, 2024 was done by the accounting firm CliftonLarsonAllen, and the Senate posts its own. These audits check the books; they are not the broader audit voters approved in 2024. Tarr's statement that the Massachusetts constitution is older than the U.S. Constitution is also accurate: it dates to 1780, the U.S. Constitution to 1787. Sources: Joint Accounts of the Legislature audit, fiscal 2024; Senate audit, fiscal 2024; Massachusetts Constitution.

He said the House bill gives the auditor the four areas she asked for in her court filing, including "non-disclosure agreements, financial agreements and the books of the House." What he opposes, he said, is the auditor reviewing "how bills are passed, how committees are formed," which he called "legislative functions that the Constitution reserves specifically for the Legislature." He said he explains his view at length on his campaign website.

The state's own yearly audits

Separate from the fight over auditing the Legislature, state agencies already get an outside audit every year. The Office of the Comptroller hires the accounting firm CliftonLarsonAllen for the statewide Single Audit, required by federal rules, which tests how agencies handle federal money and keep the state's books. It does not cover the Legislature, and it is not the State Auditor's work.

The Cape Ann Current digitized the last five reports. They list 160 findings: 28 for fiscal 2021, 20 for fiscal 2022, 37 for fiscal 2023, 39 for fiscal 2024 and 36 for fiscal 2025. Of the 36 most recent, 17 were rated material weaknesses, the more serious kind, and 20 repeated a problem from the year before. The Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development, which runs unemployment insurance, had the most findings each year, 18 in fiscal 2025. The most common problems were late or missing federal reports.

Search every finding by year, agency and type of problem.

Sources: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Single Audit Reports for fiscal 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022 and 2021, Office of the Comptroller.

Question 9: the 2024 gun law

The question, explained

Question 9 is a referendum on Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024, the firearms law the Legislature passed in 2024. A Yes vote keeps the law. A No vote repeals it. As the League described it, the law adds rules for handguns, ghost guns, machine guns and assault style weapons, creates three state commissions and increases state oversight of firearms training and licensing. New training rules under it took effect April 2, 2026.

Both sides' official arguments are in our voter guide.

Christina Delisio: No. "This new law is really confusing to understand and in my opinion, it makes law-abiding citizens subject to things that just aren't necessary." She said that so far no training courses besides the State Police's are approved.

Fact check: Not accurate as of the state's latest list. The state's approved basic firearms safety course list, updated May 19, 2026, includes 44 approved courses. Providers include the State Police, the Municipal Police Training Committee, the Andover and Worcester police departments and private trainers such as Smith & Wesson Academy, SIG Arms Academy and USCCA. Gun shops and instructors did report delays and gaps in approvals when the rules took effect in April. Sources: Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, Approved Basic Firearms Safety Course List, updated May 19, 2026; the same list as first issued April 1, 2026; Western Mass News, April 1, 2026, on gaps when the rules took effect.

Gil Frieden: Yes. "I'm so proud of Massachusetts' gun record in terms of having not a lot of gun deaths." He said his campaign website lists how he will vote on all nine questions: "I'm voting yes on all of them except for two."

Gil Frieden on all nine ballot questions
Q1Public records for the Legislature and governorYes
Q2Union rights for public defender staffYes
Q3One open primary, top two advanceYes
Q4Register to vote on Election DayYes
Q5New cap on state tax revenueNo
Q6Nature for All FundYes
Q7Single family homes on smaller lotsYes
Q8End retail recreational marijuanaNo
Q9Keep the 2024 gun lawYes

Sources: his campaign's ballot guide, checked Oct. 16, 2026, and his answers to our questionnaire, which match. Tarr and Delisio gave positions only on Questions 4 and 9 in these interviews.

Dru Tarr: Undecided. "I've got to be honest, I'm still a little up in the air on this question." He said the law passed before he took office, that he owns a firearm himself and that he wants to keep Massachusetts' firearm safety record "in a way that's constitutional and that's reasonable for firearm owners."

Fact check: Close. Tarr said Massachusetts is "number one" in firearm safety. The Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions reports that Massachusetts had the second lowest gun death rate in the country in 2024. Sources: Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, Gun Violence in Massachusetts, 2024.

Question 4: registering to vote on Election Day

The question, explained

Today, Massachusetts voters must register at least 10 days before an election. For Nov. 3 the deadline is Saturday, Oct. 24. Question 4 would let eligible residents register and vote on the same day, including on Election Day. A Yes vote allows that; a No vote keeps the current deadline.

Christina Delisio: No. "I believe that there's plenty of time for people to register and to vote in advance. ... I just don't think there's a need for it."

Gil Frieden: Yes. "Increasing access to the ballot is paramount." He said turnout in the March 31 special election was under 25% and added, "If there's one person that wants to vote on Election Day, let's sign them up and have them vote."

Fact check: Frieden's 10 day registration rule is accurate. On turnout, the state's official results show 5,511 ballots cast in the March 31 special election across the four towns; the results page does not list a turnout percentage. Sources: Secretary of the Commonwealth, registering to vote; Secretary of the Commonwealth, March 31, 2026 special election results.

Dru Tarr: Yes, with safeguards. "We don't want someone going from Gloucester voting, going to Rockport saying, 'Oh, I just moved into town,' voting." He said he has talked with the city and town clerks about it.

ICE detentions in our communities

The PROTECT Act, explained

Gov. Maura Healey signed the PROTECT Act on Aug. 5, 2026. According to the governor's office, it:

  • Bars immigration arrests without a warrant at courthouses, schools, child care centers and health care facilities.
  • Limits civil immigration enforcement in nonpublic areas of state buildings.
  • Prohibits new 287(g) agreements, in which state agencies help enforce federal immigration law.
  • Lets parents name a guardian for their children ahead of time in case they are detained.
  • Creates a state law claim against officials, including federal agents, who violate someone's constitutional rights.

Supporters say it protects people seeking court, school or medical services. Critics, including the Department of Homeland Security, which calls Massachusetts a sanctuary state, say limits like these make it harder to arrest people who have committed crimes. Federal agents can still make arrests with a warrant.

How many people ICE has arrested

Massachusetts: ICE made 7,031 arrests in Massachusetts from Jan. 20, 2025 through March 10, 2026, according to ICE records obtained by the Deportation Data Project and analyzed by WBUR. That is nearly five times the 1,470 arrests in the final 415 days of the previous administration. Of those arrested, 46% had no criminal conviction or pending charge, 35% had pending charges and 19% had convictions. The Department of Homeland Security disputes that analysis and says 70% of its arrests involve people with criminal records, counting immigration offenses and records outside the United States.

Arrests continued this summer: 572 in July 2026, WBUR reported. At least 614 people were detained at Massachusetts courthouses in 2025, according to court records obtained by GBH News, including 227 in the court region that covers Lynn and Lawrence.

Cape Ann: There is no public count for Gloucester, Rockport, Essex or Manchester-by-the-Sea. The ICE records released so far do not identify the town where an arrest happened, and the courthouse data is reported by region, not by court. The candidates did not cite local numbers either.

Christina Delisio said the PROTECT Act was "a great job" but "didn't go far enough," and she backed ICE's role. "We don't want our communities in fear, but we do need to seek and find dangerous criminals to protect us all, immigrants and citizens alike."

Gil Frieden said he is a leader with the LUCE Immigrant Justice Network of Massachusetts, which runs a hotline that sends volunteers to "bear witness" when someone reports an ICE detention. "We're not trying to stop or fight or anything." He added, "I would love to abolish ICE." He told the story of a family friend from Iran, helped to come to the United States by his mother in 1972, who went on to teach engineering for 44 years.

Dru Tarr said the detentions are "really, really troubling to me." He said the federal government "really seems like they're just trying to cause terror in communities," and that he has heard from citizens "afraid to go about their day to day lives." He said the PROTECT Act helps, but federal law enforcement often supersedes state law.

Fact check: Accurate in general. Under the U.S. Constitution, federal law generally takes precedence over state law, so state laws like the PROTECT Act mainly govern state and local officials and places the state controls. Tarr's description of where the act limits arrests matches the governor's office summary. Sources: Governor's office, Aug. 5, 2026; U.S. Constitution, Article VI (Supremacy Clause), National Archives.

Reaching constituents

Delisio and Frieden were asked how they would communicate with people in all four towns. Tarr was not asked this question in his interview.

Christina Delisio said she would like to send a regular newsletter, post on social media and hold office hours. She said that last month she went to posted office hours "and no one was there." "I have a palm card. It has my email and it has my phone number on it. I am accessible all the time."

Gil Frieden said a state representative is "our customer service rep," a lesson from his 16 years in banking. "However people wanted to be communicated with," he said, adding that people can find him at the senior center at least once a week.

In their closing words

Each candidate had 60 seconds to speak to voters.

Christina Delisio named "affordability, accountability and local control" as her three pillars, said she has signed a taxpayer pledge not to raise taxes, and said zoning changes such as MBTA zoning and accessory dwelling units should come to communities "in a standalone bill and not piled into an omnibus bill."

Gil Frieden read a poem he wrote in the style of "First they came," ending, "And then they came for the ballot and there was no one left to ensure that my vote still mattered." He said he would bring "frontline community work and that real world financial experience to Beacon Hill."

Dru Tarr said he has served about six months after nearly 10 years on the staff of former Rep. Ann-Margaret Ferrante. "Housing affordability is a huge, huge part of what the work we're doing right now," he said. "We want to make sure that Gloucester, Rockport, Manchester-by-the-Sea and Essex are a good place to live."

What they did not discuss

The League's questions focused on the audit, two ballot questions, immigration enforcement and constituent service. Several issues that shape daily life on Cape Ann did not come up, so these interviews do not tell voters where the candidates stand on them.

Not covered in the League interviews
Jobs and the local economyNot discussed
The state budget and state financesNot discussed
Health care and its costNot discussed
Energy, grocery and child care costsNot discussed
School funding and local aidNot discussed
Fishing and the working waterfrontNot discussed
Coastal flooding and climateNot discussed
TransportationNot discussed
TaxesMentioned only
Delisio mentioned her no new taxes pledge in her closing; not asked
Housing and affordabilityMentioned only
Tarr and Delisio named it as a goal in their closings; no plans discussed
These interviews do not tell voters where the candidates stand on these issues.

Where to find more. The Cape Ann Current sent all three candidates the same written questionnaire on Oct. 2, covering housing, the working waterfront, the coast, town budgets and school aid, transportation, a first bill and all nine ballot questions, with a deadline of 5 p.m. Friday, Oct. 16. Gil Frieden's answers ran Oct. 6: read them in his own words. Dru Tarr sent his answers Friday afternoon, before the deadline: read them in his own words. Christina Delisio did not answer the questionnaire by the 5 p.m. Friday deadline and politely declined to comment. If she sends answers later, we will publish them the same way and update this write-up.

How to vote

  • Early voting: Saturday, Oct. 17, through Friday, Oct. 30. Hours differ by town.
  • Register to vote: by Saturday, Oct. 24.
  • Election Day: Tuesday, Nov. 3, polls open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.

Find your polling place, early voting hours and every race on your ballot in our free voter guide, see the Fifth Essex race page, or read our write-up on the state's voter booklet and the nine ballot questions. The candidates also met in a public forum at Gloucester High School on Oct. 13.

About the League of Women Voters of Cape Ann

In its official description, the League of Women Voters says: “The League is a political grassroots network and membership organization that believes the freedom to vote is a nonpartisan issue. For more than a century, we’ve worked to empower voters and defend democracy. As a women-led organization, we encourage everyone to take part in our democracy.” (League of Women Voters, About us)

In the video, the Cape Ann League describes itself as “a nonpartisan organization which encourages the active participation of citizens in their government,” and says, “We do not endorse any individual candidates for office.” The interview questions “were suggested by League members and were not given to the candidates in advance,” the League said. The interviews were recorded with 1623 Studios in Gloucester.

Watch: the full interviews on YouTube (38 minutes; Tarr at the start, Delisio at about 11 minutes, Frieden at about 23 minutes)
The League: lwvcapeann.org

The Cape Ann Current does not endorse candidates or ballot questions and does not accept political advertising.

To get election updates and other free public information each morning, sign up for the free daily email.

Sources

See something wrong? Email [email protected]. Read our standards and corrections policy.